<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everton v Liverpool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.anfieldroad.com/news-archive/200809273152/everton-v-liverpool.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.anfieldroad.com/news-archive/200809273152/everton-v-liverpool.html/</link>
	<description>The Archives. Liverpool FC. 18 titles. 5 European Cups. Unofficial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://archive.anfieldroad.com/news-archive/200809273152/everton-v-liverpool.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6027</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anfieldroad.com/?p=3152#comment-6027</guid>
		<description>@ Ken. From what I have read on some forums it may be that they had to allow them the option. A particular poster who claims &#039;to know&#039; reckons that they will have until the end of this period to give the money back, i.e. sell but it could well be another spurious claim. 

The second point - I&#039;m no expert but unless one texan does a favour to another I&#039;m not sure that the benefit would have a direct link, rather if economic stability beings to emerge this would have a benefiting effect for Hicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ken. From what I have read on some forums it may be that they had to allow them the option. A particular poster who claims &#8216;to know&#8217; reckons that they will have until the end of this period to give the money back, i.e. sell but it could well be another spurious claim. </p>
<p>The second point &#8211; I&#8217;m no expert but unless one texan does a favour to another I&#8217;m not sure that the benefit would have a direct link, rather if economic stability beings to emerge this would have a benefiting effect for Hicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

